Julieta Estable vs Emily Seibold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Estable vs E. Seibold

Julieta Estable
ARG
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
25
-
Height
-
799
C. Rank
476
297
Best Rank
442
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Emily Seibold
GER
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
25
-
Height
-
799
C. Rank
476
297
Best Rank
442
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Estable 1 - 0 Seibold
They have played 2 sets in total, with Julieta Estable winning 2 and Emily Seibold winning 0. The last match between Julieta Estable and Emily Seibold was at the W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista, 16-03-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Julieta Estable getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Estable | 1 |
| Seibold | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista(03-16-24)
Julieta Estable
6
6
Emily Seibold
3
4
J. Estable vs E. Seibold H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.92% (284-190) | Career Total W/L | 54.52% (199-166) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Estable vs E. Seibold Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julieta Estable has won 30.11% of points on their second serve, while Emily Seibold has won 34.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julieta Estable, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emily Seibold has won 49.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.64% and 33.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Julieta Estable has saved 40.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emily Seibold has saved 45.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Julieta Estable has won 45.00% of matches played (W/L 9/11), with Emily Seibold winning 60.00% (W/L 36/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Julieta Estable has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 262/170), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/19). Emily Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 38/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/15).
- Player level: In the last year, Julieta Estable has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 6/9), where as Emily Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.10% of matches (W/L 23/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julieta Estable winning 1 times and Emily Seibold being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Julieta Estable winning 2 and Emily Seibold winning 0.
- The last match between Julieta Estable and Emily Seibold was at the W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista, 16-03-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Julieta Estable getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julieta Estable has played against opponents with an average rank of 488.2 while Emily Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 424.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julieta Estable has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emily Seibold has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Julieta Estable has converted 44.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emily Seibold has converted 41.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Julieta Estable vs Emily Seibold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Estable vs E. Seibold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:50:0 | Average Match Time | 1:50:0 |
| 84% (53/63) | 1st Serve % | 53% (31/59) |
| 58% (31/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (3/3) |
| 51% (30/59) | Return Points Win % | 43% (27/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Estable 42%, Seibold 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Estable 61%, Seibold 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Estable 41%, Seibold 54%.
J. Estable Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 4-2 ret. | ||
QF | W | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
E. Seibold Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 3-2 ret. | ||

J. Estable vs E. Seibold Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.92% (284/190) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.52% (199/166) |
| 57.96% (619/449) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.21% (445/361) |
| 53.75% (5098/4386) | Games Win/Loss | 53.40% (3751/3274) |
| 53.66% (22/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.58% (38/28) |
| 60.65% (262/170) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.89% (147/116) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 170 | Aces Total | 464 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 645 | Total Double Faults | 1057 |
| 1:10:27 | Average Match Time | 1:19:31 |
| 517.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.34 |
| 69% (13875/20204) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10481/17300) |
| 57% (7899/13875) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (6313/10481) |
| 45% (2851/6329) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3004/6819) |
| 48% (1415/2926) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1239/2460) |
| 49% (10140/20888) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8647/17948) |
| 50.54% (93/91) | Challenger W/L | 47.80% (87/95) |
| 65.86% (191/99) | Futures W/L | 61.20% (112/71) |
| 60% (281/469) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (196/350) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (41/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (18/50) |
| 57% (71/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (41/85) |
| 88% (279/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (202/180) |
| 12% (279/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (202/22) |
| 19% (195/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (163/21) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction09:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal